I know we already discussed this elsewhere, but in case anyone sees this and has the same issue I'll post my response here as well:
Ahh okay I understand. I'll be honest, better tracking of the "oldest" trap is something I've been meaning to add for a while, it's just been kinda pushed around on the to-do list haha. I'll try to look into it soon though.
More trap layout options is a possibility, I'm just lazy with UI related work I think currently it just picks a layout randomly? But for some like 5 coordinates I think it has a small amount of options to pick from. I can look into this as well though.
Yeah no worries, I can definitely see this not being the largest priority, just wanted to mention it because it does seem like poor functionality!
In regards to trap layout, it currently it does the "X" layout with the middle trap being the set coordinate. I've heard a "+" shape is more efficient overall, one space between each box.