Think about what you just said. That's not firemaker specific. That's banking specific. Which makes it a client api issue.
oh lol mb
I don't see how coming from a different client makes any difference. They still have an api right? So if an action performed by one of their api methods stuffs up, that's not the bot writers fault, that's for the client developers to fix. (I'm not having a go at you, just educating
)
hey man i didn't know that so thank youI don't see how coming from a different client makes any difference. They still have an api right? So if an action performed by one of their api methods stuffs up, that's not the bot writers fault, that's for the client developers to fix. (I'm not having a go at you, just educating
Although, i do know some of our competitors have bad attitude towards their bot authors and tel lthem to write their own method if the api one isn't working properly instead of fixing it. So i can see where the confusion could come from
Since Simba works around color theres little or no chance that it is a Bot problem. It is always, or mostly, around the bot writter.Although, i do know some of our competitors have bad attitude towards their bot authors and tel lthem to write their own method if the api one isn't working properly instead of fixing it. So i can see where the confusion could come from
But in this case we're talking about Bank.withdraw. Does simba not have a withdraw method? Because that's what i'm talking about. Methods like that.
yea sorry i am thinking RM is like Simba but its bot so i apologies
Yes there is. But since i've never seen that broken i thought things were different.
Agreed same problem here it takes a long time for responding
