Basically the user would have to write a review about a bot after X hours of using it. This promotes an active forum and the responsible bot author knows what to improve on his botsorry for retardness but what exactly is this?
Thats the weakness of this... @Baddest Man on Earth any idea?
I thought he meant with the built in reviewing system in the resource section or whatever.Basically the user would have to write a review about a bot after X hours of using it. This promotes an active forum and the responsible bot author knows what to improve on his bot
Tomorrow, you will see a black van parked in front of your house. Three masked men will walk out and kick down your door. They will waterboard and electrocute you. Then they will ask you to change the review. They will repeat that process every day until I am satisfied.
but my review is legitimate, the bot has issues. Rating all the bots your team makes as 5 stars isn't very helpful.
But it's masterrace, no negotiating.
And I'm on vacation from bot development so don't expect to fix anything soon.
This is implying I didn't already post about those issues a while ago.
I never said it was optimal, I just haven't implemented them yet.
None shall be above the law.There still can be put some more thinking into this but it's a begin!
Like users with 200+ posts or something should be care free about this ect.
2-9 seconds is nothing when a bot actually works 
