Request Addition to UnexpectedItemHandler
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,255
Why not just drop the logs instead of attempting to drop everything? :^)
I'll jump in game and get the data needed and add it to it
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 6,774
- Thread Author
- #3
Because that can end up with a full inv of random shit under certain circumstances. More so with other skills but it's still an issue. I've added an action check to my drop filter so that it no longer tries to drop destroyables but it still needs to be handled.Why not just drop the logs instead of attempting to drop everything? :^)
I'll jump in game and get the data needed and add it to it
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,255
I assume you mean like gems for mining, and I guess bird nests for woodcutting
It's added for next update.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,255
Yeah I don't think it's possible for UnexpectedItems to completely fill up an inventory... They're usually all limited in numbers or stackable.
Although most other things handled by UnexpectedItems are bankable. I thought that the reason for the ItemHandler was basically to be a safety net for when bot authors forget to code for them (i.e. trying to drop an undroppable item, like @Aidden was trying to do).
I don't really have much of an opinion on it because I always disable the UnexpectedItemHandler tbh.
Although most other things handled by UnexpectedItems are bankable. I thought that the reason for the ItemHandler was basically to be a safety net for when bot authors forget to code for them (i.e. trying to drop an undroppable item, like @Aidden was trying to do).
I don't really have much of an opinion on it because I always disable the UnexpectedItemHandler tbh.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 6,774
- Thread Author
- #8
That's not the answer. Sliskelion piece is an unexpected item and therefore should be handled by the handler. Simple as that.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2014
- Messages
- 3,212
If you ask me, the item is waay too frequent to be destroyed. Just store it its one slot.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,255
This.
It doesn't matter how frequent it is. Personally I disable the Unexpected Item Handler, but that doesn't mean that it shouldn't be updated to handle new unexpected items lol
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 6,774
- Thread Author
- #12
If it was it's broken, lol.
Unless you added it after seeing this thread and never mentioned it. But i'm pretty sure i've never seen it destroy them either way.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2014
- Messages
- 3,212
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,255
Strange, I just tried it then and it worked for me. RIP 50 Sliskelion pieces
It just destroyed them for me no problem.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2014
- Messages
- 3,212
Then it was probably something on my end. Now it destroyed it here too.
@Cloud can you check the onItemAdded (inventory listener) please?
Ut doesnt trigger
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
- Messages
- 139
You can choose in-game if you want to keep getting them or not, just go to the scoreboard at the Grand Exchange and pick the rewards option.
I bot a lot on my skiller, so the extra Slayer xp each week is always welcome. Too bad it destroys the pieces now.
I bot a lot on my skiller, so the extra Slayer xp each week is always welcome. Too bad it destroys the pieces now
.- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
- Messages
- 5
I know it seems like this was handled a while ago, but I am currently leveling my divination and when you are nowhere near a bank, if you wanted to keep the sliskelion pieces, would the option to either keep or destroy the item need to be handled on an individual script level or on the client through the unknown item handler?
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2013
- Messages
- 3,044
The bot would have to specify that it can operate safely without destroying unexpected items.