[defeat3d]

Returns true when running without SDK argument.

@Cloud

 

[ozzy]

Do you think this could be related to the reason ManagedProperties seem to be caching locally even when my script is on the store? I was going to post a thread, but I haven't been able to get more info until I get my account back.

 

[defeat3d]

Do you think this could be related to the reason ManagedProperties seem to be caching locally even when my script is on the store? I was going to post a thread, but I haven't been able to get more info until I get my account back.

ManagedProperties are always stored local I believe, the Manifest is a different thing though.

 

[ozzy]

ManagedProperties are always stored local I believe, the Manifest is a different thing though.

Beta 76 changed that, but it still caches locally when running in sdk mode, however even when running from the store it doesn't seem to sync for me.

• AbstractScript#getSettings now returns an instance of ManagedProperties that syncs itself to the servers. This means that when you save a setting within a script, it is saved on the servers so that when you load runemate on a different pc the same settings are loaded.

 

[defeat3d]

Beta 76 changed that, but it still caches locally when running in sdk mode, however even when running from the store it doesn't seem to sync for me.

• AbstractScript#getSettings now returns an instance of ManagedProperties that syncs itself to the servers. This means that when you save a setting within a script, it is saved on the servers so that when you load runemate on a different pc the same settings are loaded.

It syncs it yeah, probably syncing the local version with the one on the cloud.

 

[arbiter]

Do you think this could be related to the reason ManagedProperties seem to be caching locally even when my script is on the store? I was going to post a thread, but I haven't been able to get more info until I get my account back.

Very possible. @Cloud needs to test this more.

 

[cloud]

I don't think this is true... it relies on an instanceof check which is highly unlikely to be a problem.

 

[arbiter]

I don't think this is true... it relies on an instanceof check which is highly unlikely to be a problem.

Let's confirm this with a simple unit test through the Bot Store just to be safe.

 

[defeat3d]

Let's confirm this with a simple unit test through the Bot Store just to be safe.

Confirmed, the fix we pushed earlier didn't help.

 

[arbiter]

Confirmed, the fix we pushed earlier didn't help.

Double confirmed as the ManagedProperties cloud database is quite populated.

 

[cloud]

Double confirmed as the ManagedProperties cloud database is quite populated.

?

 

[defeat3d]

Double confirmed as the ManagedProperties cloud database is quite populated.

It all starts to make sense...
 
Close pls. @EvilCabbage @Aidden