Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign up now!

Resolved Exception alerts

Primate
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
3,469
Can we please have an option disable these? It gets a little annoying when you have a bot you're rewriting and the old version gives you 100+ notifications per day.
 
Also worth mentioning, most of these exceptions are thrown because someone is stopping the bot during Execution#delayUntil(), and they all give you alerts because they're unique because of the random(?) numbers in lambda references.

Ex: at productions.celestial.bots.hunter.v2.tasks.general.LayTrap.lambda$execute$396(LayTrap.java:45)
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
609
I've never gotten any errors from people stopping the script during Execution delays. And if it is the case where the exception is unavoidable then it is an acceptable time to surround it with a try catch.
 
Primate
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
3,469
@Defeat3d please provide an example to assess.
Here's one:
ki6fKg2.png

Here's another:
MkVgz2C.png


The only difference is the numbers after "rm.coN$$Lambda$NUMBERS/NUMBERS.call"
 
Mod Automation
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
3,044
The line below the "Called by" is the relevant one. Check out that line and fix what's actually causing the error. Hiding it is just avoiding the problem.
 
Primate
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
3,469
The line below the "Called by" is the relevant one. Check out that line and fix what's actually causing the error. Hiding it is just avoiding the problem.
I know, but that has nothing to do with what I'm requesting here, lol.
 
Mod Automation
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
3,044
I know, but that has nothing to do with what I'm requesting here, lol.
Adding the ability to turn it off is enabling Bot Authors to ignore bot-breaking bugs. Not exactly something we want to be wasting dev hours on.
 
Engineer
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Messages
2,776
"most of these exceptions are thrown because someone is stopping the bot during Execution#delayUntil(),".
delayUntil should never throw an exception itself, instead your condition is likely the source of the error.
 
Top