Welcome!

I'm not sure, running the bot without familiar atm. I do remember that when I ran it without a spawned familiar, but with the abyssal lurker pouch in my inventory, it ran straight to the summoning obelisk to renew summoning points. It did not spawn the lurker afterwards though. Will try looking...

The bot doesn't renew or summon my abyssal lurker pouches. I tried with and without doing it manually at the start but after the summoning timer runs out the bot enters the bank, and gets stuck on status: "filling beast of burden". Yes, I checked "use familiar" and yes, i chose abyssal lurker...

Nah. You waste the time of other people. Grow up

No thank you guys for putting time into writing these bots and sharing them. I wouldnt be able to enjoy this game without them.

Same dude. Any updates on this? :)

Man do i feel bad for these bot authors sometimes lol

Awesome!

Feeling any better? :p

There's also a chance that someone reported you due to suspicious behaviour. Idk if they're able to automatically detect what happened on your bot

You might want to add a proper description of your bot.

Got it, thanks for the quick reply :)

Same for me at viridian skillchompas, any idea what the problem could be @awesome123man ?

Yeah it was too soon to put a price on this bot.

Which bot? How many hours? Did you break in between?

The problem was simply the lack of a cooldown timer, not really worth screenshotting, is it? I do however still have problems with the bot eating when my HP is at like 8000 while i set it up to eat at 5000...

I had the same problem. I put them on actionbar 4 and enabled the cooldown timer to fix it.

Excellent bot. Works flawlessly for me.

I'm not using any familiar and so i have not checked that box. Thanks for the quick reply :)

So it looks like I'm the only one who is experiencing this problem: as soon as i click "start" on the bot or after like one run of runecrafting the bot crashes and the following error message shows up: java.lang.NullPointerException at robot.IiIIIiIiIi.execute(i:73) at...

Any updates on this? Would be extremely useful :)