Welcome!

I know.

same

There is a new format for the release thread because of the beta. I'll update my script tonight. The auto updater has been fixed. Everything will work properly with the new Beta format.

Congrats, now you just pushed it back a month.

It updates every hour with the newest info. Mainly, people should note that the amount of bugs open was at 30 or so a week ago. Cloud and Arbiter have been hard at work getting things fixed up, and it really shows by the numbers. Cloud posted about it in the shoutbox yesterday, so I'm assuming...

Very Soon™ Take a look at the numbers: Spectre Alpha Status | Community | RuneMate

100% serious.

Rumor has it, something is coming.

I'm currently doing that: Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet

Yes and no. I have a hackintosh laptop. So yes, I have a mac, but no, I don't have an Apple. That being said, os x is fantastic, and I'm planning on installing it on my new desktop as well.

@Cloud Spectre uses 0% cpu on my Mac still :p

@Cloud @Arbiter Make a Beta application page. Then just write a script that auto adds users to the Tester rank who are older than X amount of months or who have had supporter for X amount of days. Don't release the criteria publicly though that way people don't just try to hit the minimum reqs...

That site wants me to subscribe. fuck that.

Yes.

Sadly, the pathing is all handled by the client's internal web. The web is getting rewritten for spectre though.

Lol, @pent crashed rune prices when he released a sudoku solver back on Runedream that hopped the mouse (before bot detection was looking for this). It could solve like 20 puzzles a minute. Made like 6mil/hour for about a day. Then it made -12mil/hour. That being said, the current user base of...

Essentially, I want some sort of hash that will be unique for each player, ideally one based on forum user name, and on based on RSN. Actually, I can probably just do it myself.

Can't stop laughing.

There is a monthly and quarterly option in the usage stats graphs, but neither of them actually work because the data only goes back 3 weeks. @Arbiter @Cloud @Cloud @Arbiter any input on this? Never mind, it's just VERY bad UX where I have to manually change the range when selecting a larger...